Wage Increases: Good But Not Enough

National economic policies,  based on the assumed paramount importance of growth (and not on sustainable growth and the fair distribution of its benefits) have resulted  in the increase of economic inequality in most countries.  The rich have become richer and the poor  poorer. In this article, long time advocate for the poor Fr Kevin Barr writes about \wages and Government policies in Fiji-- Croz


By Fr. Kevin Barr
03 July 2015h


Much publicity was given to the recent wage increases for our workers.  But let us be very honest about the National Minimum Wage and the other small wage increases published in the last few days.

Over a year ago Dr Mahendra Reddy (after extensive research) proposed that the National Minimum Wage should begin at the rate of $2.32 an hour and be regularly increased each year. Mr Hazelman (representing the Fiji Commerce and Employers Federation) announced publicly that the Federation had intervened with government to have the National Minimum Wage reduced to $2.00 an hour.  Our new Government is now restoring the National Minimum Wage to its originally proposed rate of $2.32.  In truth, if the employers had not intervened, the National Minimum Wage for July this year should now be at least $2.55 or more.  But even that would not be sufficient. As many have stated the National Minimum Wage of $2.32 is a joke and totally inadequate in view of the current cost of living.

Yet, of course, the National Minimum Wage will benefit to some extent those 10% of workers (such as domestic workers, gardeners etc) who are not covered by the Unions (about 30%) or the Wage Regulation Orders (about 60%).

In principle the National Minimum Wage should be measured according to the Basic Needs Poverty Line (or the current cost of living) which is probably at least around $4.20.  The Bureau of Statistics can tell us the exact figure.

Again the increases given to those workers in the ten industries covered by the Wage Regulation Orders are minimal.  Representing the increases by giving percentages is an old trick and very deceptive.  It sounds impressive to read that the wage of a particular industry has increased by 4 %.  But, if the previous wage was $2.50 an hour it means that in real terms the newly increased wage will only be $2.60 an hour – a miserable increase of only ten cents an hour.

I am open to correction but I am told that there has been no significant increase in the Wage Regulation Orders for at least two years.

We are told that: “The increases in the Wages Regulation Orders is based on a formula Agreed to by the Employment Relations Advisory Board and takes into account the Consumer Price Index and other figures on how each industry is faring to calculate the increases”. Yet Fiji should be following not its own formula but the criteria for Wage fixing established in accord with the ILO Convention to which Fiji is a signatory.  Its principal criteria is the current cost of living in the country (which is represented by the Basic Needs Poverty Line) but it also takes into account other issues as well. If you begin with a low unjust wage and increase it only by the current Consumer Price Index you will still have a low unjust wage.

Unfortunately in recent years “productivity” has been highlighted by some influential people as the major criteria for wages.  But how can you expect workers to be more productive unless their basic needs in terms of housing, nutritious food, education and health care are being met for themselves and their families?

As the 1997 UNDP  Fiji Poverty Report  stated clearly, low wages is one of the major reasons for the high degree of poverty and hardship in Fiji.  We should be ashamed of ourselves for allowing this situation to continue.  We are constantly being informed about the great increases in economic growth in the country but the benefits of this economic growth are not shared.  The old “trickle down” theory is now recognised as a myth and the so-called “social responsibility” of many of our employers (not all) revolves around sponsoring sporting events, fashion parades or tourism extravaganzas – not a just living wage for their workers.

Our successive Governments have agreed to implement the policies of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund which we are told will increase economic growth.  Yet at the Economic Forum held in Davos earlier this year it was agreed that the policies of these International Financial Institutions (IFIs) had produced a frightening increase in poverty and inequality all around the world.    When will we wake up?  Yet we have actually invited the World Bank to analyse the results of our most recent Housing Income and Expenditure Survey.  How really credible and reliable will their results be?

Government has never acknowledged that the 20% devaluation of our currency in 2011 meant that food costs increased by 36% and building costs by 29% (according to the Bureau of Statistics).  Then this was followed by an increase in VAT by 2.5% which, because it is a regressive tax, affects the poorer sector of our nation more than the rest.  All this occurred while wages did not increase significantly.  Of course in all this we followed the recommendations of the IFIs.  It is about time we “stand up to the big boys” as our honourable AG once suggested in another context.

Of course Government has done well in reducing education costs, providing scholarships and pensions and free health care and water for families on low incomes and assisting housing for the poor.  These are laudable achievements and are most welcome but they are no substitute for a just living wage. These are things which any caring government should be providing for its people – particularly when two thirds of its population is either in poverty or close to poverty.

Government has bent over backwards to accommodate the demands of employers and investors and has given generous wage increases to politicians and those in the upper levels of the Civil Service. We are told that the country can now afford such increases. Yet workers in full-time employment are left with low, inadequate wages.  While employers and investors are given huge tax deductions and allowed to influence the decisions of some politicians (in the style of “crony capitalism”), worker’s unions are treated with scorn and their leaders insulted and even mistreated.

Of course all this is not entirely new.  As Professor Wadan Narsey  wrote in his detailed report  on the 30 year history of the Wages Councils, Just Wages in Fiji – Keeping Workers out of Poverty (2006:76ff):

            “It was clear that most employer’s representatives resisted all proposals
            for wage increases, and they were quite successful in their attempts. 
            The long term outcome was the severe deterioration in real wage rates
            and  a growth in poverty in the nation. ... Employers would cite the usual
            litany of industrial woes, warn of redundancies and unemployment that
            high wage adjustments would cause and give a lower counter-proposal. 
            They would plead ‘inability to pay’ or ‘this is not the right time’ and get
            their own way.”

He went on to state that “stolen wages” (as he terms the refusal to pay an adequate just wage) have seriously benefited employers but seriously disadvantaged thousands of workers whose quality of life has deteriorated.  He claimed that in the 30 years following Independence more than one billion Fijian dollars has been transferred from worker’s wages to employer’s profits because the business lobby was exceedingly influential in getting its own way.

We know that there are many good employers in the business sector who are deeply concerned for their workers and pay wages above those required.  However there are also many selfish and greedy individuals who want to increase their profits by every cent possible.

It is about time that we stop boasting about our levels of economic growth, the successes of our tourist industry, the new opportunities for our garment industry and the need for greater worker productivity and see that justice is done for our workers.  

Business may be the engine of growth but it is our workers who keep the wheels of the engine turning.  The pitiful wages paid to so many of our workers is a disgrace to the nation.  We can promote business without being anti-worker and anti-Unions.

If we want to bring religion into it (and, of course, all issues of economic social justice involve moral principles) then we could quote James (5:1-6) where it says: 

“Listen to the wages you kept back.  They are calling out.  Realise that the cries of the workers have reached the ears of the Lord God.”

Or, perhaps even more compelling are the words of Isaiah (59:12-17) which says that God is outraged not only by the existence of injustice, but by the failure of anyone to do anything about it.

Let’s hope that we will see some radical changes in the interest of social justice in Fiji today and that our economy will become truly people-centred.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lessons from Africa

Fijian Holdings Scandal: Betrayal by their trusted sons

The Ratu Tevita Saga, Coup4.5, Michael Field, the ANU Duo, and Tonga